rupester No Longer to Read My Page:
March 30, 2012: 1:36 p.m.   Well, as suspected (she's nothing if not predictable), I have heard from "Her Hineyness, The rupe-a-dupe"
about the blog I wrote early this morning.
UNQUOTE. Now for the marked version that shows her errors.
"Linda,Now, I get to have my fun with her usual idiocy.
She says that I am wrong. What is not in the bill is what is dangerous. Well, I have no crystal ball to predict what she refers to as to what was left out. Was the poem "Jabberwocky" left out? Yes. That must be what makes the bill dangerous. I think that's the key. No "Jabberwocky" equals "Danger, Will Robinson! Danger!" Or maybe it's the fact that the whole of the Kama Sutra was left out? Perhaps the geneology of Buddha should have been put in? That would have made it safe. rupester, you're a riot. To paraphrase you, "If written as is, you should realize your mistake."
What rupester wrote after the election you'll have to read the blog to see. I am innocent of being anywhere near a Nazi or a Skinhead. I don't hate you, rupester, any more than you hate yourself. I totally and absolutely disagree with you and have every right to do so. The girl in the Limbaugh incident was no more innocent in the situation than you are of lying. She wanted us to pay for her birth control and she opened herself up to public comment by demanding to be heard in a Congressional hearing. She is the one who put herself out there for public comment (as my youngest son [whom you brought into the discussion and we shall cover in a moment] so quickly pointed out). The girl said she and her friends were having so much sex they couldn't afford all the birth control they needed. Well, if that's something that she wanted kept secret, she shouldn't have been testifying -- demanding to be heard and opening herself up for public comment -- and she shouldn't have made that statement. Look up the definition of "slut" or "prostitute" in the dictionary. Slut means: "an immoral or dissolute woman; prostitute". Not Rush's definition. He just used the word correctly, if redundantly. Having sex outside of wedlock with multiple partners is -- to those of us who still have morals -- being immoral. What is wrong with still having morals and standards? Nothing.
NOTE ADDED 4/12/2012   I intended to add that Limbaugh's advertisers are not leaving in droves. The truth is that Rush has more than enough advertisers and his ratings and "listenership" are up! So rupester is wrong again. As usual.
You, rupester, ended that paragraph with a real howler: "You cannot slander or libel unless it is the truth." IDIOT! If it's the truth, it is neither slander nor libel. How often do I have to explain that to you? Neither Rush nor I committed slander or libel. The dictionary defends Rush, and the truth is the truth and I have told the truth about you for years and years. I have used your own words and actions to do so. Is there no getting through to you? Sorry. Rhetorical question.
I don't spend hours trying to ruin your reputation or the reputation of others. You and they do that themselves. All I do is shine a spotlight on your words and actions and their words and actions. As to my name being "Legion", ooooooohhhh.... I am proud! If I have upset the Wrongies out there, I'm seriously and honestly proud of myself. I don't care what names they call me. I have no shame in Wrongies being angry at me nor with them calling me names. It makes me happy! I am proud and glad of my enemies. It's just as good to be known by my enemies as by my friends. It clearly tells which side I am on. As to being "unbalanced and possibly dangerous", I don't care if my enemies think that. It sounds like they are afraid of me. Shock. Wrongies afraid of someone who speaks the truth? It's not unexpected.
You "will never again look into [my] Website, ever." Yeah. Right. I believe that like I believe obamination is my savior. Get real. I know you better than that. You're reading this right now. You can't help yourself. You think you've written something so clever, so cutting, so demeaning as to make me cowar and cringe. You have been patting yourself on the back since you hit the "Send" button. See how sad I am?
You bring my son into this. Dangerous territory. I didn't write about your family until you brought them into the discussion with your e-mail to me in which you threw your granddaughter under the bus, or they inserted themselves into the picture (mr. maureen rupe's Ethics Commission complaint against Pete Costello's website, "MaureenRupeExposed.com"). You bring my son into it without cause. That's not smart and it's a tactic used by you and your ilk but you're not going to get away with it. First, since he is sending you an e-mail reply himself, I'll leave the fine details to him.
Second, it was not a County Board as you allege. Get your facts straight if you're going to cast aspersions on someone. He stood up for what he believed in while he was on the Board of Directors for the North Brevard Heritage Foundation (NBHF), a NON-COUNTY, fully volunteer entity. It was not STARTED BY, ORGANIZED BY, NOR FUNDED BY the County. It was started by a non-historian, ms roz foster (about whom I would have so much more to write if it weren't for considerations to the family impacted by foster's actions) and it was the Pritchard house that got Brandon involved. He loved that house from the time he was a small child and when he learned of the existence of the organization, NBHF, he jumped at the chance to get involved in preserving the house. Fact is, the house was not preserved, it was turned into a farce and an image of foster's delusion, not a true historical restoration or preservation. It was for standing against that abuse of the history of the family and the historicity of the house and its contents that Brandon was voted off the Board in an action and vote similar to the PSJ HOA and their vote to dismiss Pete Costello and I from their board, which you supported. Before you gossip more about my son, do a little finding out of the truth, little liar. Some day the truth may pass your lips. As it stands, you lie as much and about as well, as obamination who wouldn't know the truth if it kissed him on the lips, slipped him the tongue and grabbed his crotch all at the same time! You are the same!
What e-mail from Scott Knox are you refencing? Be specific. I have received several e-mails from Know-Nothing-Knox. Most in defense of the wrong-doing of D1 and issues you support. He wrote that Scammer scarborough didn't have to provide a list that YOU hand delivered less than a day prior to my requesting a list of those who have expressed an interest in serving on the PSJAB. He wrote defending the non-delivery of information requested under a FOIA requesting an e-mail forwarded to you from Liz Lackovich of Comm. Fisher's D1 office, although it took no more than five minutes under my direct supervision search. "...and a hundred things you know about me..." Are they as accurate as the "thing" you know about my son being thrown off the COUNTY Board? Yeah. You belie your false information. But if you really wish to put it out there, put it out there. Send it to me and -- I promise you in front of all these witnesses reading this page -- I will publish all of it. Send it all. I dare you.
You say I am busy trashing others with lies. What lies? Where have I lied? If you can prove it's a lie, send the proof to me and I will print it. Remember, I have a history of printing corrections, unlike you and your ilk. Recall: you have sent me but two corrections that I could confirm as being the truth, and those two corrections I did make. You said -- no, it was Amy Tiddlywinks -- that I had not gotten all of the information that the Five Committees that reviewed the PSJ Incorporation Feasibility Study. I checked into the possibility by calling my contact in Tallahassee and he said that he had forgotten to mail me additional information they had regarding the corrections that PSJ4T had sent them. Things like YOUR signature (as well as Carmine Ferraro's and Mary Tees's) were left out by PSJ4T. Remember, or need reminding? If you need reminding, check out my TRUTH page and it will surely remind you. The other correction you sent me was on the Amendment 4 issue and I changed that info and thanked you publicly for alerting me to the facts. I still appreciate it. So what have you sent me that is the truth that I have not published? Hmmm? If the truth is so important to you, then why not send me more of it? You see I have a history of obliging. PROVE THAT I LIE.
As to my reputation, I am well pleased with it. If others think poorly of me, that's their right and I applaud them for thinking independently. Not a big deal. I care nothing for the opinion of anyone except my husband and my GOD. If they are happy with me, then I am content. Your opinion of me matters to me less than a particle of dust in all the universe. Same is true of the rest of the population of the universe with the exceptions already mentioned: my sons included since I am their Mother and not their friend. If not well-respected by them in every item now, I will become well-respected by and by as they age and will be seen as the one they should have listened to in the decisions they chose to go against my advice. That is true of most parent/child relationships if the parent is a good parent (apparently I am considering your response to my son's e-mail to you). I do hope my mother thinks well of me, but even if she didn't, I no longer answer to her and she is not accountable to me. We have our differences and that is as it should be. These are the people who matter most in the world to me. If that's as little as I care for their opinions, why on earth should I care what you or others think of me? Also consider how much conceit must you, rupester, have to think that I care about, or should care about, the opinions of yourself and others? You and they have no hold on me. As I stand before GOD I will hear, I am confident, "Well done, my good and faithful servant!" because GOD doesn't call us to be nice to our enemies and to liars. In fact, Jesus Christ used words like viper, fools, hypocrites, blind guides, and states that others "are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness". They are also, in Christ's own words, "full of hypocrisy and iniquity". I am no meaner than Christ. We, as Christians, are called to do battle with such things and such people, as we are called to put on the full armor of GOD so that we "may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil." That's what I do daily. Anyone with a problem with that has a problem with me, but a bigger problem with GOD Himself. Your problem. Not mine.
rupester, you can block me all you want. I only wrote to you this last time to correct your LIE. If you wish to block me, hurray. (Thrilled, aren't I? Impressed, surely. Sad, absolutely. Scared, ooooweeee.) It doesn't prevent me from commenting on your writings in the pooper-paper and I shall continue to do so. It is good to see that you have started listing your references at least. After my e-mail to the editor/owner of the pooper-paper it's nice to see you include those things to make it easier to check your sources. At least you are doing that correctly nowadays.
One more thing: Bring my family into our disagreements again and I will have to draw and quarter you in writing. If you think this, the PSJ incorporation stuff, the anti-rupester D1 bid pages I did were harsh, you ain't seen nothing yet. Even my brother notes that I am a mother bear/lion/dragon when it comes to protecting my children. Watch where you tread in that arena. Fair warning. Do one smart thing in your lifetime: stay away from my kids unless and until I bring them into it as you did with your granddaughter. (Just over halfway down the page.) Understand? Now go crying to your Wrongie friends about how scared you are of me and how "unbalanced and dangerous" I am! They may applaud your bravery.
Remember: Anyone who does not give you a wake-up call when they see you being stupid, self-destructive, or both, just plain doesn't care about you. It's those of us who do wake you up who care.
This website created by, maintained by and copyright 2012 by Linda McKinney; because Freedom isn't Free,
but speech supposedly is!
Do NOT copy without prior written permission from the author.