Rupe's Porn Allegation
July 8-14, 2015   This page started when I received the first e-mail in quite a while from Pete Costello. It contained a resignation from the Port St. John Dependent Special District Advisory Board. That resignation? rupeadupe's. I don't know why I did it, but I wrote to the D1 office and asked for a copy of e-mails from her from April 18 to June 18 2015, just to cover all possibilities. They sent me two e-mails without headers. One had attachments: a search engine result and a page from my website.
The first e-mail:
"Commissioner Fisher,And the attachments: A page from my website page ("2 of 43") and search engine results.
The second e-mail:
"Hi Marcia,Note that neither of them have a header? I was trying to get a header because when I requested the e-mail with the resignation, I wasn't expecting the second e-mail ("Hi Marica") and I was wondering what "Marcia" had written to rupester that made rupester respond in that way. I assumed, because Marcia NEWELL works at D1's office as Legislative Assistant that it was Newell. I was told that rupester was writing to a Marcia DAY who retired in September 2013. Later FL SS 119 requests proved (via including the headers) that rupester did write to Marcia DAY, as proven when I received the headers from Cristina Berrios, County Attorney's Office (although rupester was also WRITING TO MARCIA NEWELL and D1's office so either way it's Marcia Newell to whom rupester's response is addressed):
"From: Maureen Rupe
So, it goes this way: rupester resigns from the PSJAB May 7, 2015 blaming Pete Costello for rupester's resignation and claiming victimhood (but all of rupester's "proof" is against ME). When asked why by Marcia NEWELL in a phone conversation the next morning, rupester claims that my website, MaureenRupeExposed.com, has (allegedly) caused rupester's name to be associated with pornography. This is a claim rupester has been making since 2013. In an e-mail to the then-owner of PSJHistory.com and forwarded to me:
"-------- Original Message --------And in another e-mail rupester writes in part:
"From: Maureen Rupe
I also received from Cristina Berrios of the County Attorney's office, the following e-mail sent from D1 County Commissioner, Robin Fisher, to Marcia NEWELL:
"From: Commissioner, D1I believe he intended to say "talk" to her, not "Tall to her." Note, however, that Fisher's response was "When is his term up?" He's thinking of when he can get rid of Costello. When can he replace Costello and placate rupester. (Favoritism, anyone?) To which Ms Newell responded:
"From: Newell, MarciaNote the part that says "her name showed up on a porn site"? Yeah. That's something different and new to me. When rupester previously said that my website, MaureenRupeExposed.com "has gone to many sites as a porn site", I immediately thought rupester meant that it was linked to websites that had porn on them. That's what a link does; it takes you to a new website or another page on the same site, thus "going to". I had never heard that her name via the MaureenRupeExposed.com website had allegedly been PLACED ON a website as in when I do blurbs or this website, the things I write here and the links I use are on my website. That was totally new to me.
It's also something that has yet to be PROVEN. I wrote the following e-mail to D1, and several other County employees as well as to rupester asking that she provide PROOF of her allegations:
"To: Marcia Newell, Cathleen Cummings, Cristina Berrios, Maureen RupeYeah, I've read so much of her crap that I'm starting to write as poorly as rupester does. Wunnerful.
Note that I included rupester in the "To:" list when I sent this e-mail. I have yet to hear from rupester regarding any proof. rupester's family looks at porn (according to what rupester told Marcia Newell) so why is there a delay? I'm sure they can go in and find their browser history (or maybe it's allegedly on their favorite porn sites, I don't know) and find the site they allegedly found it on. Why the delay? If the attorney has seen MaureenRupeExposed.com on a porn site, I'm sure he made notes during his investigation for his case, why not ask him about where he allegedly saw it?
After all, we all know that the so-called "proof" rupester provided to D1's office after the phone conversation is NOT any sort of proof that would stand up in a court of law. I've sent D1 and other County employees the unproving of her "proof". This is what I sent:
"Fifth: The search results she provided you contained nothing but PAID advertisings. Note that at the top of the page it states “Bright House, Road Runner, Web, Sponsored Links”. That means that the search engine she used contracted with that search engine to put those results on the page of anything remotely associated with the actual search. Thus, the acne treatment, the Spokeo results (which may actually have the aerial view of her house on their site, but it wasn’t something any of the owners of MRE.com had anything to do with), and the pornography links.As you can see, I have shown how cookies work, that the advertising that showed up in the search result that was the alleged "proof" of rupester's allegations were no doing of MaureenRupeExposed.com owners -- past or present -- and that it was because the search results were found QUOTE "whilst looking at porn sites for a case [my bolding]" UNQUOTE. rupester DISPROVES HER OWN ALLEGATIONS WITH HER OWN WORDS. Yet, rupester continues to insist that there is pornography associated with my site by saying that it is actually ON PORN SITES as a link TO MaureenRupeExposed.com.
As was pointed out to rupester after rupester's first allegation in Feb. 2013, anyone looking for porn on MaureenRupeExposed.com will be sadly disappointed. I also think that most webmasters would be a bit more diligent in their links. After all, if you have a political website as are my two, you don't link to something without first understanding what it is. If you find a link on rupester's campaign website I bet rupester's webmaster checked the link and made sure it was working, made sure it went to where it was supposed to go, etc. Same with porn sites, I would assume. If you're going to spend the time linking to something you at least check it out first to make sure it's something you want to link to. After all, you don't want to be a porn site that links to the Human Genome Project, MaureenRupeExposed.com or something that would bore porn seekers. They'd never come back to your porn site if your links take them to places they don't want to go. I'm sure porn seekers would not be interested in MaureenRupeExposed.com because there's no porn there and never has been. Just to be certain of this, I talked to a tech support person at my internet hosting company (which is NOT "Globe Net") and they went all through my website and said there is no porn, no links to porn and no links FROM porn sites.
Note two things here: rupester claims that because of MaureenRupeExposed.com allegedly being linked FROM porn sites TO MaureenRupeExposed.com that it
"has devastated my family and myself".It's so terrible that rupester and her whole family are "devastated". Porn = TERRIBLE in that sentence. YET, in a phone conversation with Marcia Newell which Marcia Newell wrote an e-mail to Fisher about, rupester stated:
"She also said that family members have seen her name pop up on a porn site."So which is it? Is it okay to view porn or not? Because if you're willing to view it but you're not willing to allegedly have a link from a porn site TO a site that bears your name but HAS NO PORN ON IT, then what does that say about your value system? It's okay to look at the daughters, sisters, mothers, etc., (Sorry. That's an assumption. It may be porn sites featuring more men than women for all I know.) of others but it's not okay to allegedly have a NON-porn link at the site YOUR FAMILY is spending time on? Is that right?
Another question: Was the alleged link specifically MY site, or was it just the name "Maureen Rupe" (her quote was "family members have seen her name pop up")? IF just the name, how many people are named "Maureen Rupe" in the whole world? The internet covers the whole world and I'm sure there is more than ONE "Maureen Rupe" in the world. If it's just the name how conceited is it to think that every reference to a "Maureen Rupe" is definitely HER? Did they click on the link to see if it goes to a porn site? If not, why not? If so, did it go to my NON-porn MaureenRupeExposed.com site? A simple screen capture print out with their mouse hovering over the link would be the proof. It would have to show that my website, MaureenRupeExposed.com was on a porn site because the address would be at the bottom of the printed page, and the mouse hovering over the link would tell the address of the linked site. If that linked site was my site then maybe I'd believe it.
Also, remember that "she said she has copies of it" writes Marcia Newell about the phone conversation. I have yet to see the copies of rupester's alleged proof. I wrote to rupester on July 10, 2015 asking for it, but have received nothing in response. IF rupester actually has a printed copy (copies?) of the proof, I request that rupester scan it and send it forthwith, ASAP, immediately, toot-sweet. rupester says she has it. rupester says her family has seen it, too. Let them send me proof. Get them all looking for the proof. They already surf porn sites according to what rupester told Marcia Newell. Let's see how well they work together as a team and provide me some PROOF. IF rupester had PROOF she could send it now. But I have received NOTHING. Are they all still swarming those porn sites and searching, searching, searching for the alleged link to MaureenRupeExposed.com? Or maybe they got sidetracked and they're busy looking at the porn instead of FOR PROOF? I don't know but IF they've seen it, too, as she alleged to Marcia Newell then where is the PROOF?
rupester's allegations are meant to make her as big a victim as possible without actually claiming that I killed her (which would be a difficult claim considering she's still alive and complaining). That's all this is about to rupester but to me it's about much, much more. It's about the TRUTH and it's about rupester's controlling ways. rupester sending the portion of my website page and the PAID SPONSORED LINKS search engine results that used cookies already on the computer (apparently on rupester's family's computers, too) to D1's Commissioner's office as "proof" proves that rupester had intent to smear my name and to try to influence the County AGAINST myself and AGAINST Pete Costello. rupester was trying to get Costello thrown off of the PSJAB via alleging a link between MaureenRupeExposed.com (which Pete Costello started during rupester's campaign to become D1 Commissioner -- running against Robin Fisher, no less) and pornography. rupester was alleging some sort of misconduct on Costello's part and that it was "devastating" to her family and herself. rupester put it on public record that MaureenRupeExposed.com was linked on porn sites and that Costello and I knew about it because rupester had told us and that we refused to take it down, thus upsetting her deeply and devastating her family (that looks at porn). That's slander. It's not just slander, it's slander on official County e-mail, public record.
There are a few more little things to consider. To wit: AFTER rupester resigned the PSJAB May 7, 2015, she suggested one Gary Musselman to replace her and in writing to Gary Musselman about the position, rupester wrote:
"On Jun 19, 2015, at 5:07 PM, Maureen Rupe email@example.com wrote:IF Pete Costello's presence at the Board meetings was so unbearable, why did rupester write to her potential replacement that "I enjoyed being on it."? If it's a horrible thing to be in the same room with Pete Costello how can you enjoy being on it? A little split personality there? Or is it just that she's targeting Pete for removal?
When asking rupester if she could suggest a replacement for her, Marcia Newell wrote the following to rupester:
"From: Newell, MarciaAgain, favoritism much? When you leave a position on a Board, Committee, etc., are you asked to suggest a replacement? I remember a time when rupester gave a whole list of names of people to stack the PSJAB with: all people who think like rupester. Do you get that privilege?
Now what's going to upset rupester even more is that the ruse did her no good. The County did not step in and release Mr. Costello from the PSJAB, as rupester wished. The County did not step in and reprimand me and encourage me to take MaureenRupeExposed.com down, as rupester wished. The County did -- although it took a while to get them the way I wished -- deliver the e-mails I requested and they did give me the TRUTH and rupester's own words and I use the TRUTH and rupester's own words on my website all the time. The fact that rupester won't be happy about the TRUTH being written here and that her words told the world that her family looks at porn is not going to make rupester happy, either. That's her problem and her doing. rupester's the one who told Marcia Newell that tiny tidbit of useful information. rupester's the one who revealed it. IF it's not the truth, then either rupester LIED AGAINST HER FAMILY, or rupester's GOING TO BE accusing Marcia Newell of lying about it. Which is it? Personally, I believe Marcia Newell.
So, next time rupester makes an accusation that is so disgusting I hope rupester has more than a single search engine result to "prove" anything she chooses to next allege. If rupester wants me to ask questions about something she sent me, then she may wish to be more careful about what she sends. I asked questions after rupester's first allegation and then I asked questions when I heard about her resignation because I had no idea of what Pete Costello had been accused of. In requesting the e-mails, I opened a whole lot of new information up and I was forced to ask even more questions. Now I have another, perhaps final, question in this alleged porn connection. That question is: Maureen Rupe, WHERE IS THE PROOF?
Home; Tribute; Page Deux; Storage; Video Page; Government Links; PSJ Info; Religion; Services; Miscellaneous Pages; Politics; My Links; My Blog; "True Conservative" Defined
Remember: Anyone who does not give you a wake-up call when they see you being stupid, self-destructive, or both, just plain doesn't care about you. It's those of us who do wake you up who care.
This website created by, maintained by and copyright 2008 by Linda McKinney; because Freedom isn't Free,
but speech supposedly is!
Do NOT copy without prior written permission from the author.